ACLU Defends Suspended Pro-Indigo Girls High-Schoolers
The Columbia, S.C., chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union has
stepped in to offer legal defense and advice to five Irmo High School
students who protested the school's cancellation of an Indigo Girls concert
due to the folk-rock duo's homosexuality.
The students were given eight-day suspensions following a class walkout
last Thursday.
Meanwhile, seven other advocacy groups -- the National Campaign for Freedom
of Expression; the Massachusetts Music Industry Coalition; the National
Coalition Against Censorship; Rock Out Censorship; Artists for a Hate-Free
America; the New England Free Expression Network; and the Boston Coalition
for Freedom of Expression -- released a statement on Friday that condemned
the cancellations and praised the students who protested the action.
"The students should be learning that the freedom of expression is the
cornerstone of our nation's democracy," said David Greene, program director
of the National Campaign for Freedom of Expression. "But sadly, the school
leaders are demonstrating instead that the students' and the performers'
fundamental liberties may be thoughtlessly disregarded."
The ACLU, a civil liberties organization, was approached by a parent of one
of the students on Thursday, according to Carl A. "Andy" Brumme III, ACLU
staff counsel in Columbia, S.C. This happened after protesting students
were held in a school conference room for two hours, pending
administrators' investigation of the protest and contact with parents and
guardians.
When Principal Gerald Witt distributed eight-day suspensions to the
students, as well as seven others who have not yet asked the ACLU for help, the ACLU took an even bigger interest in
the case, claiming that the school was going above and beyond its standard
policies on tardiness and skipping class, Brumme said. "The principal had
spoken with [local newspaper] The State and told them that students
who participated in the walkout would serve a three-hour detention on
Saturday," he explained. "After about a half-hour of their protest, the
students were asked by a teacher, 'Don't you think it's time to get back to
class?', and they replied that they were not ready, that they still had
some things to discuss."
At this point, according to Brumme, the students were allegedly led into a
conference room where they were held for two hours without being able to
contact their parents. "When the principal told them they were being
suspended for eight days for disobeying a teacher," Brumme continued, "they
were shocked."
According to District 5 School Board spokeswoman Jane Rish, the high school
marks students tardy if they miss the first 10 minutes of class. After 20
minutes, they are marked absent and given a Saturday detention. "We are
following our district guidelines with these students," Rish explained,
"but the problem is they fall into four or five different categories of
discipline."
Though all 12 students were officially suspended for disobeying a teacher,
District 5 School Board spokesman Buddy Price said on Friday that some
students may also have been suspended for disrupting the educational
process. Five of the suspended students have yet to accept the support of
the ACLU.
According to Irmo High School policy, students who are suspended have a
chance to appeal the decision in a face-to-face meeting with their parents
and the principal. Rish and Brumme said that these meetings took place
Monday and that Principal Witt seems to have held his ground. The next
step, should the students elect to appeal the decision, is a meeting with a
district hearing officer. Should the suspensions remain in place, Brumme
said, the ACLU is prepared to file suit against the school.
"I've communicated numerous times with the school's attorney, and their
position is that it's a discipline issue and not a First Amendment issue,"
Brumme explained. "At the moment, I'm trying to get a temporary restraining
order against these suspensions, to put them back in classes while this
process is going on."
If the suspensions hold, Brumme added, the ACLU will file suit on behalf of
the students to collect damages and attorneys' fees. "These students
thought they were going to get detentions, and they are willing to serve
them," Brumme said. "These suspensions, however, are a violation of the
First, Fourth and 14th Amendments, mainly against freedom of speech and
assembly."
At Farragut High School in Knoxville, Tenn., where three students were
given three-day suspensions following their involvement in similar Indigo
Girls-related protests, teacher and concert organizer Jeff Callahan
resigned as advisor for the school's student newspaper, The Crow's
Nest. The concert was called off at this school soon after
administrators learned of the Irmo cancellation. However, in this case, the
principal cited the band's use of vulgarities in their lyrics -- rather
than their sexuality -- as the impetus for the cancellation.
"I think the decision speaks for itself," Callahan said. "But I do want to
add that this fiasco with the Indigo Girls was not the reason why [I
resigned]. My decision involved other things." Callahan did concede,
though, that Farragut Principal Edwin Hedgepeth's last-minute cancellation
of the concert was "the straw which broke the camel's back."
Leslie Aldredge of the Shagg Network, the organization that booked the
Indigo Girls' controversial swing through high schools and universities in
the South, agreed with the assessment of the situation by Green, of the
National Campaign for Freedom of Expression. Stating that she hadn't really
anticipated such a controversy to erupt, Aldredge said she felt that the
educators in this case are doing their students a disservice.
"The fact that an amazing talent like the Indigo Girls was willing to do
this on their own dime was an incredible gesture of goodwill and an
opportunity for kids to be in touch with artists," Aldredge said. "I
understand the conservative political climate, but I think we missed out on
an incredible educational opportunity."