Our New Reality Main
 Be Heard Transcript
 What's Going On: Fact Files
 News Headlines
 Afghanistan Map
 Give and Get Help
 "What's Going On?"
 Benefit CD


Related Partner Content:
 State Department

 Fight For Your Rights
 MTV International


 Who Is Colin Powell?
 What's Going On Between Israel and the Palestinians?
 The "Axis Of Evil": Iraq, Iran and North Korea
 Is AIDS Still The Threat That It Used To Be?
 Has The Threat Of Terrorism Decreased?
 What's Going On In Kashmir?
 Why Is Argentina's Presidency A Revolving Door?
 What New Weapons Are U.S. Forces Using?
 'Kandahar,' The Movie
 Who Is John Ashcroft?
 What Is Treason?
 What Are Military Tribunals?
 What Are Terror Alerts?
 Is Iraq Public Enemy #2?
 USO Special for the Troops
 What Is Ramadan?
 How Can Volunteers Fight Terrorism?
 What Is The Selective Service?
 Who's Spinning The War?
 Who Is General Tommy Franks?
 What's In The New Anti-Terrorism Law?
 Who Is Tommy Thompson?
 How Do Antibiotics Work?
 Who Is Pakistan President Pervez Musharraf?
 Who Is General Richard Myers?
 Who Is Condoleezza Rice?
 A Visit To Ground Zero
 What Is Uzbekistan?
 What Is Islam, The World's Second-Largest Religion, Really About?
 Feeling Depressed Or Afraid? What To Do To Cope
 What Is Al-Jazeera?
 How Did The United States Become The 'Great Satan'?
 What Are Pakistan's Fundamentalist Madrassas?
 What Is The Northern Alliance?
 Where Does Osama Bin Laden's Money Come From?
 Who Is Donald Rumsfeld?
 What Is The Taliban?
 What Are Special Ops?


The wide latitude military tribunals grant the government in the prosecutorial process has angered civil rights and civil libertarian groups.
Photo:CNN

 Watch the video
They are war courts conducted under the jurisdiction of the U.S. military, not the traditional U.S. judicial system. On November 13, the president signed an executive order that authorized the use of military tribunals to try suspected terrorists.

Here are several key differences between military tribunals and normal criminal courts:

  • Judges from the military — not from the U.S. judiciary system — run military tribunals.
  • No appeals are available to those convicted in military tribunals. In criminal courts, convicts have the right to appeal their cases to a higher court.
  • Military tribunals are held in complete secrecy — no television cameras are allowed. So it is possible that a military tribunal has already taken place or is underway at this very moment and we just don't know about it.
  • Military tribunals are under the president's direct control. He gets to handpick who will be tried, and does not have to inform defendants of the crime with which they are being charged.

    Military tribunals are for non-U.S. citizens. The president says he'll only use the tribunals for al Qaeda terrorists captured overseas. But technically, any non-citizen could be subject to a tribunal — including immigrants living in the United States.

    Like some traditional criminal courts, military tribunals can impose the death sentence on a convict. And because such proceedings are held in private, it is possible that an execution could also take place behind closed doors.

    The wide latitude military tribunals grant the government in the prosecutorial process has angered civil rights and civil libertarian groups. Members of Congress were also displeased that the president had taken so significant a step without their approval or even consultation.

    In a December 6 statement, Ralph Neas, president of the liberal civil rights group People for the American Way, blasted the president for his executive order. "Judicial review and congressional oversight are not annoyances to be brushed aside — they are fundamental to our constitutional form of government," Neas said. "Our history demonstrates clearly that unbridled power in a time of national crisis leads to abuses and to abridgement of our civil liberties."

    Concern over the use of tribunals has not been confined just to the left. Among the most vocal critics of President Bush's executive order have been some conservative members of his own party.

    Republican Congressman Bob Barr, who led the successful effort to impeach President Clinton, recently told The New York Times, "These changes are so vast and fundamental, the House must hold hearings in the very near future, before we adjourn for the year." He expressed concern that the president's order "will likely set precedents that will come back to haunt us terribly."

    Despite criticism from both left and right, President Bush has not backed down on the issue. During remarks delivered to a conference of U.S. federal prosecutors, he said, "non-U.S. citizens who plan and/or commit mass murder are more than criminal suspects. They are unlawful combatants who seek to destroy our country and our way of life, and if I determine that it is in the national security interest of our great land to try by military commission those who make war on America, then we will do so."

    The president also promised that trials will be conducted impartially. "We will act with fairness, and we will deliver justice, which is far more than the terrorists ever grant to their innocent victims," he said.

    And polls show that the public largely supports the president's order. According to a Washington Post survey released on November 29, six out of 10 Americans back the move.

    Share your thoughts on the attacks in Afghanistan You Tell Us.

    An MTV News Staff report

     Back to Fact Files Index




  • © 2007 MTV NETWORKS. © AND TM MTV NETWORKS. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. TERMS OF USE, USER CONTENT SUBMISSION AGREEMENTCOPYRIGHT POLICY  and  PRIVACY STATEMENT/YOUR CA PRIVACY RIGHTADVERTISING OPPORTUNITIES E-COMMERCE ON THIS WEBSITE IS BROUGHT TO YOU BY MTVN DIRECT INC.