For other uses, see Writer's block (disambiguation).
This article is written like a personal reflection or opinion essay rather than an encyclopedic description of the subject. Please help improve it by rewriting it in an encyclopedic style. (March 2013)
This article contains too many or too-lengthy quotations for an encyclopedic entry. Please help improve the article by editing it to take facts from excessively quoted material and rewrite them as sourced original prose. Consider transferring direct quotations to Wikiquote. (March 2013)
Writer's block is a condition, primarily associated with writing as a profession, in which an author loses the ability to produce new work. The condition varies widely in intensity. It can be trivial, a temporary difficulty in dealing with the task at hand. At the other extreme, some "blocked" writers have been unable to work for years on end, and some have even abandoned their careers. Throughout history, writer's block has been a documented problem. Professionals who have struggled with the affliction include author F. Scott Fitzgerald and pop culture cartoonist Charles M. Schulz. It can manifest as the affected writer viewing their work as inferior or unsuitable, when in fact it could be the opposite. The research concentrating on this topic abounded in the late 1970s and 1980s. During this time, researchers were influenced by the Process and Post-Process movements, and therefore, focused specifically on the writer's processes. The condition was first described in 1947 by psychoanalyst Edmund Bergler.
Irene Clark notes that writer's block is a common affliction that most writers will experience at one time or another. Mike Rose defines writer's block as "an inability to begin or continue writing for reasons other than lack of basic skill or commitment". Additionally, The Purdue Online Writing Lab says, "Because writers have various ways of writing, a variety of things can cause a writer to experience anxiety, and sometimes this anxiety leads to writer's block." The literature seems to focus on two areas related to writer's block: causes and potential cures or intervention strategies.
2 Coping strategies,
3 See also,
5 External links,
Writer's block may have many or several causes. Some are essentially creative problems that originate within an author's work itself. A writer may run out of inspiration. The writer may be greatly distracted and feel he or she may have something that needs to be done beforehand. A project may be fundamentally misconceived, or beyond the author's experience or ability. A fictional example can be found in George Orwell's novel Keep the Aspidistra Flying, in which the protagonist Gordon Comstock struggles in vain to complete an epic poem describing a day in London: "It was too big for him, that was the truth. It had never really progressed, it had simply fallen apart into a series of fragments." Additionally, Peter Elbow discusses in his article Closing My Eyes as I Speak: An Argument for Ignoring Audience, that while audience awareness is important, an over awareness of audience can be paralyzing and can cause writer's block.
Other blocks, especially the more serious kind, may be produced by adverse circumstances in a writer's life or career: physical illness, depression, the end of a relationship, financial pressures, a sense of failure. The pressure to produce work may in itself contribute to a writer's block, especially if they are compelled to work in ways that are against their natural inclination, i.e. too fast or in some unsuitable style or genre. In some cases, writer's block may also come from feeling intimidated by a previous big success, the creator putting on themselves a paralyzing pressure to find something to equate that same success again. The writer Elizabeth Gilbert, reflecting on her post-bestseller prospects, proposes that such a pressure might be released by interpreting creative writers as "having" genius rather than "being" a genius. In George Gissing's New Grub Street, one of the first novels to take writer's block as a main theme, the novelist Edwin Reardon becomes completely unable to write and is shown as suffering from all those problems.
Hillary Rettig says "writer's block" itself is a misnomer because "block" implies one monolithic cause, and most people who struggle with their writing really suffer from many causes. She says the condition is better thought of as a kind of "spaghetti snarl" of those causes, which include: perfectionism (itself, a conglomeration of many causes), ambivalence (about the topic one is trying to write about, or publishing it, or writing itself), time constraints, resource constraints, ineffective work processes, unhealed traumatic rejections, and a disempowering context. Each of these causes is entangled with the others, and can reinforce them. However, she says the spaghetti snarl model is ultimately a positive thing for writers because snarls can be untangled, and the more you untangle the easier the remaining untangling gets.
Writer Arthur Hermansen advocates misconception of the process of creativity itself is cause for mislabeling the temporal aspect of subconscious contemplation and processing of the creative solution, be it the next chapter, the next compositional element of a painting, such as what color to choose to paint with next as writer's block, painter's block or as like. Creativity does not cognitively observe temporal timetables like the rational world requires, he suggests. Thus the time it takes for a creative solution to compose deep within the imagination or elsewhere may not occur in rational, demanding timescales we observe in other cognitive processes less sophisticated or abstraction oriented. In our convenience necessity paradigm and misunderstanding, we assign an irrational view and label to a mental process that does not recognize time passing. This process continues irrespective of time passing even if the creator's solution ultimately develops, is delivered to the conscious mind for transcription or production into final form years from the time the creative problem was posed to the faculty. The result of this lack of accountability for time in the creative solution evolving process is designation, assignment and use of the label "writer's block." Mr. Hermansen states these kinds of short-sighted, error-default assumptions as "cognitive crutches indicative of the woeful romanticizing and lack of understanding of the actuality of the creative process as a high-abstraction and imaginative faculty, under developed creator's solution development tracking/archiving and production-development skill sets, and unrelated wellness or health issues bleeding over the line into a perfectly functional yet not fully understood or utilized human faculty--creativity--thus contaminating it."
It has been suggested that writer's block is more than just a mentality. Under stress, a human brain will "shift control from the cerebral cortex to the limbic system". The limbic system is associated with the instinctual processes, such as "fight or flight" response; and behavior that is based on "deeply engrained training". The limited input from the cerebral cortex hinders a person's creative processes, which are replaced by the behaviors associated with the limbic system. The person is often unaware of the change, which may lead them to believe they are creatively "blocked". In her 2004 book The Midnight Disease: The Drive to Write, Writer's Block, and the Creative Brain (ISBN 9780618230655), the writer and neurologist Alice W. Flaherty has argued that literary creativity is a function of specific areas of the brain, and that block may be the result of brain activity being disrupted in those areas.
For a composition perspective, Lawrence Oliver says, in his article, "Helping Students Overcome Writer's Block", "Students receive little or no advice on how to generate ideas or explore their thoughts, and they usually must proceed through the writing process without guidance or corrective feedback from the teacher, who withholds comments and criticism until grading the final product." He says, students "learn to write by writing", and often they are insecure and/or paralyzed by rules.
Phyllis Koestenbaum wrote in her article "The Secret Climate the Year I Stopped Writing" about her trepidation toward writing, claiming it was tied directly to her instructor's response. She says, "I needed to write to feel, but without feeling I couldn't write." To contrast Koestenbaum experience, Nancy Sommers express her belief that papers don't end when students finish writing and that neither should instructors' comments. She urges a "partnership" between writers and instructors so that responses become a conversation.
James Adams notes in his book, Conceptual Blockbusting, various reasons blocks occur include fear of taking a risk, "chaos" in the pre-writing stage, judging versus generating ideas, an inability to incubate ideas, or a lack of motivation. Additionally, The Purdue Online Writing Lab explains common causes ranging an author being assigned a boring topic to an author who is so stressed out he/she cannot put words on the page, and suggests "possible cures" or invention strategy for each.
As far as strategies for coping with writer's block Clark describes: class and group discussion, journals, free writing and brainstorming, clustering, list making, and engaging with the text. To overcome writing blocks, Oliver suggests that asking students questions to uncover their writing process. Then he recommends solutions such as systematic questioning, freewriting, and encouragement.
To the extent that a block is caused by perfectionism, Hillary Rettig recommends using timed writing exercises during which you practice non-judgmental writing as a solution. This is part of a productivity-enhancing mindset called compassionate objectivity, other elements of which include: a focus on process not product, a focus on internally derived rewards (versus externally derived ones like fame and fortune), and a sense of perspective and proportion (versus shortsightedness). Rettig says you can develop a compassionately objective world view with practice, and that doing so will automatically boost productivity.
Writer Arthur Hermansen suggests the perfectionism issue is easily overcome by simply writing a smaller format work of choice and actually perfecting it through rewriting as many times as necessary. Repeating this process multiple times minimizes the perfection issue for writers of well being. As for large format work such as a novel, perfectionism in literary practice is often a disguise for fear of completion or critique of the finished work. Perfecting a large format work is an enormous consumption of time if the author works alone. This has however, been accomplished a vast number of times in literary arts history, and authors work undaunted all the time no matter what topic they pursue because of commitment and love for literary artistry or advancement of human knowledge or experience through discovery, that being perhaps our highest purpose in all cognition. In addition, when it comes to perfectionism in large format work, if 'format fits the concept type' best practice is utilized, a non-fiction work (such as a technical manual) can be developed superbly well so revisions are only required for updated editions as the field or domain being captured in the work itself evolves. In fiction work, perfection is a more elusive quality to capture, and Mr. Hermansen recommends you are coming close to well made work when understanding is made clearest. Most experienced writers opt for a standard of making the work as well made as they are personally capable, then seeking exterior feedback for improvement/changes. It must also be stated for objectivity on this aspect of the issue that rarity and originality of the work being developed will factor greatly into the definition of perfection for any given manuscript. An example of a writer biting off more than they can intellectually or creatively chew would be the unfinished F. Scott Fitzgerald screenplay often referred to in filmic writing as the 'greatest opening to a movie ever written.' Another example of perfection being a process is several hundred years or rewriting the Bible starting in the first and second centuries, A.D.
Garbriele Lusser Rico's concern with the mind links to brain lateralization also explored by Rose and Linda Flowers and John R. Hayes among others. Rico's book, Writing the Natural Way looks into invention strategies, such as clustering, which has been noted to be an invention strategy used to help writers overcome their blocks, and further emphasizes the solutions presented in works by Rose, Oliver, and Clark. Similar to Rico, James Adams discusses right brain involvement in writing. While Downey purposes that he is basing his approach in practical concerns, his concentration on right brain techniques speaks to cognitive theory approach similar to Rico's and a more practical advise for writers to approach their writer's block.